Factors Influencing Female Patients’ Selection of Care Through Women’s Sports Medicine Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53646/ghdmmy93Keywords:
female athlete, sex differences, sports medicine, women's sports medicine, multidisciplinary, physician genderAbstract
BACKGROUND: To describe physician- and clinic-specific factors that may influence female patients’ selection of care in a multidisciplinary women’s sports medicine program.
METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed to female patients evaluated by female physicians in a women’s sports medicine clinic over a 2-month time period. Patient demographics, referral sources, influence of physician gender on selection of physician (1-7 Likert scale), and potential contributing factors (binary scale) were recorded. Patient interest in various ancillary multidisciplinary services (each on a binary scale, as below) were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 178 female patients (mean age 44.3 +/- 16.6 years) were included in this study. Patients reported 5.4 +/- 4.8 hours of weekly exercise. Physician selection was moderately influenced by a physician’s female sex (4.2 +/- 2.2; 1 being “not influential”, 7 being “most influential”). 75.3% noted some preference (> 1), and 35.3% noted strong preference (6 or 7) for a female physician, with 20.6% reporting female physician sex as the most influential factor in their selection (7). Among self-referred patients, female physician sex played a stronger influence on selection than those referred from other sources (5.3 vs 3.9, p<0.001) with 59.5% reporting strong preference. The most frequently cited reason was “I feel more comfortable with a female physician” (52.0%). Nearly 80% of patients requested access ancillary services, including injury prevention training (50.0%), exercise counseling (48.9%), nutrition counseling (35.4%), sleep specialists (16.9%), hormonal specialists (16.3%), sports psychology (7.3%), and sports cardiology (4.5%). Younger patients (< 40 years) more frequently requested sports psychology compared to older patients (40+ years) (12.2% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=0.020).
CONCLUSION: Female patients who were evaluated by female sports medicine physicians in the women’s sports medicine program frequently cited physician sex as a contributing factor in their selection, more so among patients who were self-referred. The majority of patients were interested in access to at least one ancillary service, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary sports medicine care in women’s sports medicine programs.
References
1. Bierer BE, Meloney LG, Ahmed HR, White SA. Advancing the inclusion of underrepresented women in clinical research. Cell reports Medicine. 2022;3(4):100553.
2. Cowan SM, Kemp JL, Ardern CL, et al. Sport and exercise medicine/physiotherapy publishing has a gender/sex equity problem: we need action now! Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(7):401-407.
3. Tanaka MJ, LiBrizzi CL, Rivenburgh DW, Jones LC. Changes in U.S. girls' participation in high school sports: implications for injury awareness. Phys Sportsmed. 2021;49(4):450-454.
4. S M, S R, C W, H D, M L, E OD. Sex differences in shoulder anatomy and biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Women’s Sports Medicine. 2022;2(1):5-17.
5. Owens JS, Lee MS, Jimenez AE, Maldonado DR, Paraschos OA, Domb BG. Sex-Based Differences in Athletes Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2022;10(6):23259671221100861.
6. Borgstrom H, McInnis KC. Female Athlete Hip Injuries: A Narrative Review. Clin J Sport Med. 2020.
7. Konopka JA, Hsue L, Chang W, Thio T, Dragoo JL. The Effect of Oral Contraceptive Hormones on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strength. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(1):85-92.
8. Dossa F, Zeltzer D, Sutradhar R, Simpson AN, Baxter NN. Sex Differences in the Pattern of Patient Referrals to Male and Female Surgeons. JAMA surgery. 2022;157(2):95-103.
9. Dineen HA, Patterson JMM, Eskildsen SM, et al. Gender Preferences of Patients When Selecting Orthopaedic Providers. Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):203-210.
10. Fink M, Klein K, Sayers K, et al. Objective Data Reveals Gender Preferences for Patients' Primary Care Physician. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720967221.
11. Kerssens JJ, Bensing JM, Andela MG. Patient preference for genders of health professionals. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(10):1531-1540.
12. Franks P, Bertakis KD. Physician gender, patient gender, and primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12(1):73-80.
13. Wesner ML, Vallance J. Athletes' preference for gender of team physician. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(2):143-144.
14. O'Connor C, Grappendorf H, Burton L, Harmon SM, Henderson AC, Peel J. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players' perceptions of women in the athletic training room using a role congruity framework. Journal of athletic training. 2010;45(4):386-391.
15. Janssen SM, Lagro-Janssen AL. Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(2):221-226.
16. Hayes MK, Brown S, Mulcahey MK. Women's Sports Medicine Programs in the United States: an interdisciplinary approach to the care of girls and women. The Physician and sportsmedicine. 2020;48(1):81-85.
17. Goldring AE, Ashok AP, Casey EK, Mulcahey MK. Key components and potential benefits of a comprehensive approach to women's musculoskeletal health. The Physician and sportsmedicine. 2016;44(4):417-424.
18. Tanaka MJ, Szymanski LM, Dale JL, Dixit S, Jones LC. Team Approach: Treatment of Injuries in the Female Athlete: Multidisciplinary Considerations for Women's Sports Medicine Programs. JBJS reviews. 2019;7(1):e7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Women's Sports Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.